Discontinuation of Fumaric Acid Esters is Affected by Depressive Symptomatology: A Retrospective Analysis.

Fumaric acid esters (FAEs) remain a widespread therapy option for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. However, drug survival of FAEs is limited by adverse events (AEs) or inadequate treatment response. Depressive disturbances are highly prevalent in psoriasis patients and are hypothesized to be associated with the reporting of AEs and therapy discontinuation. This study's aim was to analyze whether psoriasis patients with comorbid depressive symptomatology are more likely to discontinue treatment with FAEs due to AEs and/or inadequate treatment response. Data were retrospectively extracted from the records of patients starting therapy with FAEs in the Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Germany between 2017 and 2022, covering the first 52 weeks of treatment. Psoriasis severity and depressive symptomatology, as well as AEs and therapy discontinuation, were analyzed. Psoriasis patients (N = 95, 47.37% female) with depressive symptomatology (42.11%) were more likely to discontinue therapy due to patient-reported AEs, while the total number of reported AEs was not associated with depression. The results support the hypothesis that among psoriasis patients with depressive symptoms, the associated introspection and somatization may result in increased sensitivity for AEs and thus in quicker therapy discontinuation. In these patients, the occurrence of nocebo effects should be minimized, e.g. by special communication techniques.

Effectiveness and Safety of Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate in the Prevention of Perinatal Hepatitis B Transmission: A Meta-Analysis.

AIM: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) in the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of hepatitis B virus (HBV). METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of studies from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Medical Information Network, and Wanfang databases. The databases were searched from inception to January 7, 2023, for cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of TAF antivirals to other antivirals during pregnancy. We combined the data by means of a random-effect DerSimonian-Laird model and risk ratios (RRs) or a random-effect inverse variance model and standardized mean differences (SMDs) to determine the influence on mothers and infants. Our primary outcomes were infant weight, height, head size, birth defects, and Apgar scores. Additionally, we assessed whether newborns tested positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) at birth and at six months of age. The secondary outcomes of our investigation were alterations in levels of HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin (TBIL), blood creatinine, and urine ß2-microglobulin (ß2-M) in mothers. RESULTS: An extensive literature search identified 216 relevant publications; three cohort studies and two RCTs were included in this study. A total of 341 mothers were treated with TAF, and 342 were treated with other antiviral agents. TAF was as effective as other antiviral medications at lowering HBV MTCT rates at birth and at 6 months of age and ALT, TBIL, and HBV DNA levels. Moreover, compared with other antiviral drugs, TAF did not affect infant weight, height, head size, Apgar scores, and birth defects or maternal blood creatinine or ß2-M levels. CONCLUSIONS: TAF antiviral therapy during pregnancy was found to be safe for both mothers and fetuses.

Effectiveness and persistence of acitretin, ciclosporin, fumaric acid esters and methotrexate for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a cohort study from BADBIR.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data evaluating effectiveness and persistence of systemic therapies for patients with psoriasis are limited. Objectives To determine the effectiveness and persistence of acitretin, ciclosporin, fumaric acid esters (FAEs) and methotrexate in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. METHODS: Data from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR), a prospective, multicentre pharmacovigilance register of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving biologic and/or conventional systemic therapies, were analysed. Eligible patients were ≥ 16 years of age receiving a first course of acitretin, ciclosporin, FAEs or methotrexate between 2007 and 2021 with ≥ 6 months' follow-up. Effectiveness was defined as achieving absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (aPASI) ≤ 2 reported ≥ 4 weeks after treatment start date until date of cessation. To identify baseline clinical variables associated with treatment effectiveness, we used multivariable logistic regression models estimating the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of achieving aPASI ≤ 2. To describe drug persistence associated with ineffectiveness, occurrence of adverse events or other reasons for discontinuation, survival estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained using a flexible parametric model. Results were obtained using multiple imputed data. RESULTS: In total, 5430 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, 1023 (19%) patients were receiving acitretin, 1401 (26%) patients were on ciclosporin, 347 (6%) patients were on FAEs, and 2659 (49%) patients were receiving methotrexate at registration. The proportion of patients who achieved aPASI ≤ 2 was lower for those treated with acitretin [n = 118 (21%)] compared with those receiving ciclosporin [n = 233 (34%)], FAEs [n = 43 (29%)] and methotrexate [n = 372 (32%)]. Factors associated with ineffectiveness included prior experience to previous nonbiologic systemic therapies (acitretin) (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.96), male sex (methotrexate) (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46-0.74), comorbidities (aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.97) and alcohol consumption (≤ 14 units per week) (ciclosporin) (aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.98). Persistence associated with all reasons for discontinuation showed better survival for methotrexate compared with acitretin, ciclosporin and FAEs cohorts at 12 months [survival estimate 46.1 (95% CI 44.0-48.3), 31.9 (95% CI 29.4-34.7), 30.0 (95% CI 27.5-32.4) and 35.0 (95% CI 29.9-40.9), respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: The real-world effectiveness and persistence of acitretin, ciclosporin, FAEs and methotrexate were generally low. Previous nonbiologic systemic therapies, male sex, comorbidities and alcohol consumption were risk factors associated with treatment ineffectiveness.

Long-term outcomes of add-on direct renin inhibition in igA nephropathy: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The long-term clinical outcomes in biopsy proven IgAN patients treated with aliskiren on top of a maximally tolerated dose of ACEi/ARB remain unknown. METHODS: Patients with IgAN treated with a direct renin inhibitor and ACEi/ARB for at least 6 months were compared with a 1:1 propensityscore-matched cohort (including MEST-C score and the 12-months pre-exposure slope of eGFR matching) who received ACEi/ARB without aliskiren exposure to compute the hazard ratio of reaching the primary endpoint of a composite of 40% reduction in eGFR, initiation of KRT and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcome measures included changes in mean UPCR, blood pressure, eGFR, incidence of hyperkalemia and other adverse events during follow-up. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 2.5 years, 8/36 (22.2%) aliskiren-treated patients and 6/36 (16.7%) control patients reached the primary composite outcome (HR = 1.60; 95% CI 0.52-4.88; P = 0.412). Aliskiren treatment increased the risk of ≥ 40% eGFR decline (HR = 1.60; 95% CI 0.52-4.88; P = 0.412), and hyperkalemia (HR = 8.60; 95% CI 0.99-73.64; P = 0.050). At 10.8 years, renal composite outcome was reached in 69.4% vs 58.3% (HR = 2.16; 95% CI 1.18-3.98; P = 0.013) of patients in the aliskiren and control groups, respectively. The mean UPCR reduction between treatment and control was not statistically different (52.7% vs 42.5%; 95% CI 0.63-2.35; P = 0.556). The mean intergroup difference in eGFR decline over 60 months was 7.75 ± 3.95 ml/min/1.73 m2 greater in the aliskiren group (12.83 vs 5.08; 95% CI - 0.17 to 15.66; P = 0.055). CONCLUSION: Among patients with IgAN, add-on aliskiren was associated with less favorable long-term kidney outcomes despite an initial anti-proteinuric effect.

Response to fumaric acid esters for plaque type psoriasis in real-world practice is largely independent of patient characteristics at baseline - a multivariable regression analysis from the German Psoriasis Registry PsoBest.

OBJECTIVES: Fumaric acid esters (FAEs) are a well-established treatment option for long-term therapy of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. This study examines effectiveness of FAEs for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in real-world practice at 12 months and if patient characteristics affect the odds of clinical response. METHODS: A descriptive, multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted in a cohort drawn from the German registry PsoBest. Baseline patient characteristics were assessed as potential treatment effect modifiers. RESULTS: 444 patients (mean age 47.0 years, 39.0% female) were eligible for response analysis using nonresponder imputation at month 12. Of these, 39.6% achieved clinical response, i.e. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≤ 3 or skin clearance. In logistic regression analysis (R2 = 0.114), only baseline PASI was a significant factor: patients with PASI < 10 had a 4 times higher odds (p ≤ .001, OR 4.088), patients with PASI of 10-20 a twofold higher odds of response (p ≤ .044, OR 1.961) compared to those with PASI > 20. Neither sex, age, body weight, disease duration, comorbidity nor pretreatment had an impact on the odds of response (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS: FAEs showed a favorable response at 12 months, largely independent of patient characteristics.

Doravirine/tenofovir disoproxyl fumarate/lamivudine-induced alopecia: A case report.

We report here a case of alopecia probably caused by the fixed dose combination of doravirine/tenofovir disproxil fumarate/lamivudine (DOR/TDF/3TC) in a 46-year-old male living with HIV, previously treated with tenofovir disproxil fumarate and lamivudine-containing antiretroviral combinations. After having excluded other causes of hair loss such as sexually transmitted disease or drugs associated with alopecia, as well as poor immune-virologic conditions (i.e. low CD4+ cell count and/or high HIV viral load), a toxic effect of doravirine might be hypothesized. DOR/TDF/3TC was immediately stopped and rilpivirine plus tenofovir alafenamide fumarate/emtricitabine was started. Four weeks after changing the antiretroviral regimen, the patient reported signs of hypopigmented hair regrowth. The association between the episode of alopecia and DOR/TDF/3TC was scored as probable according to the Naranjo causality scale. We concluded that alopecia was probably related to DOR but whether it is self-limiting, cannot be predicted at this stage.

Efficacy and Safety Outcomes with Diroximel Fumarate After Switching from Prior Therapies or Continuing on DRF: Results from the Phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-1 Study.

INTRODUCTION: Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is an oral fumarate for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) with the same active metabolite as dimethyl fumarate (DMF). DRF has a safety/efficacy profile similar to DMF but with improved gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability and low (< 1%) treatment discontinuation due to GI adverse events (AEs). Efficacy and safety outcomes in patients who switched to DRF from other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have not been evaluated. METHODS: EVOLVE-MS-1 is an ongoing, 2-year, open-label, phase 3 study of DRF in adults with relapsing-remitting MS. Patients either entered as newly enrolled to DRF trials, or from the 5-week, randomized, head-to-head, phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-2 study of DRF and DMF. This analysis evaluated safety and GI tolerability in patients continuing on DRF (DRF-rollover) or switching from DMF (DMF-rollover) following EVOLVE-MS-2. Safety and efficacy were evaluated in a subset of newly enrolled patients who had received prior glatiramer acetate (GA; GA/DRF) or interferons (IFN; IFN/DRF) as their most recent DMT, prior to switching to DRF in EVOLVE-MS-1. RESULTS: As of September 1, 2020, 1057 patients were enrolled in EVOLVE-MS-1, including 166, 182, 239, and 225 patients in the GA/DRF, IFN/DRF, DRF-rollover, and DMF-rollover groups, respectively. Treatment discontinuation due to GI AEs was < 1% in all groups. GA/DRF and IFN/DRF patients experienced improvements from baseline in clinical and radiological efficacy outcomes, including significantly reduced annualized relapse rates. Rollover patients had low rates of new or recurrent GI AEs (DRF-rollover, 26.8%/4.2%; DMF-rollover, 27.1%/4.9%). CONCLUSION: After 2 years of DRF exposure, patients with prior GA, IFN, or fumarate treatment had safety outcomes consistent with previous fumarate studies. Efficacy in patients with prior GA or IFN treatment was consistent with previous fumarate studies. The data suggest that transition to DRF from GA, IFN, or DMF is a reasonable treatment strategy, with low rates of discontinuation due to GI AEs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02634307). INFOGRAPHIC.

Direct comparison of risankizumab and fumaric acid esters in systemic therapy-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Fumaric acid esters (FAEs; Fumaderm® ) are the most frequently prescribed first-line systemic treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Germany. Risankizumab (Skyrizi® ) is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to the p19 subunit of interleukin 23. OBJECTIVES: To compare risankizumab treatment to FAEs in patients with psoriasis. METHODS: This phase III randomized, active-controlled, open-label study with blinded assessment of efficacy was conducted in Germany. Patients were randomized (1 : 1) to subcutaneous risankizumab 150 mg (weeks 0, 4 and 16) or oral FAEs at increasing doses from 30 mg daily (week 0) up to 720 mg daily (weeks 8-24). Enrolled patients were adults naïve to and candidates for systemic therapy, with chronic moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Phototherapy was not allowed within 14 days before or during the study. RESULTS: Key efficacy endpoints were met at week 24 for risankizumab (n = 60) vs. FAEs (n = 60) (P < 0·001): achievement of a ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI; primary endpoint 83·3% vs. 10·0%), ≥ 100% improvement in PASI (50·0% vs. 5·0%), ≥ 75% improvement in PASI (98·3% vs. 33·3%), ≥ 50% improvement in PASI (100% vs. 53·3%) and a Static Physician's Global Assessment of clear/almost clear (93·3% vs. 38·3%). The rates of gastrointestinal disorders, flushing, lymphopenia and headache were higher in the FAE group. One patient receiving risankizumab reported a serious infection (influenza, which required hospitalization). There were no malignancies, tuberculosis or opportunistic infections in either treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS: Risankizumab was found to be superior to FAEs, providing earlier and greater improvement in psoriasis outcomes that persisted with continued treatment, and more favourable safety results, which is consistent with the known safety profile. No new safety signals for risankizumab or FAEs were observed.

Dimethyl fumarate treatment for psoriasis in a real-life setting: A multicentric retrospective study.

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is a fumaric acid esters derivate approved for plaque psoriasis as first-line systemic therapy. It has been available in Italy since 2017 and an increasing number of patients are treated with this drug. To evaluate DMF effectiveness, side effects and drug survival in a dermatological real-life setting. We performed a retrospective multi-center study in five dermatologic clinics in Emilia-Romagna, Northern Italy, which included all consecutive patients affected by moderate-severe psoriasis treated with DMF. We assessed effectiveness (in terms of PASI50 and PASI75 in an intention to treat observation) and safety (occurrence of side effects) of DMF and their association with demographic and disease characteristics, mean daily dose taken and treatment discontinuation. We included 103 patients, 78 (75.72%) had at least one comorbidity including 19 (18.44%) with a history of cancer; the mean treatment duration was 23.61 ± 17.99 weeks (min 4, max 130) and the mean daily dose was 262.13 ± 190.94 mg. Twenty-four patients (23.30%) reached PASI75 at week 12, while a further 18 patients (17.47%) reached it at week 26. Side effects occurred in 63 patients (61.16%), the most frequent were diarrhea, epigastric discomfort, nausea, and flushing. Sixteen patients (15.53%) showed an alteration of laboratory tests. In some cases side effects were transitory, while in 53 patients (51.45%) they led to cessation of therapy. The median daily dose showed a direct association with PASI50 achievement and an indirect association with treatment discontinuation. Our study shows the peculiarities of DMF in a real-world setting: effectiveness is often reached after 12 weeks of treatment and side effects could limit the continuation of the therapy but, at the same time, DMF has no major contraindications and, due to the wide range of dosage, it can allow both to manage side effects and to personalize the prescription for each patient.

Diroximel Fumarate in Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis: A Profile of Its Use.

Diroximel fumarate (Vumerity®), an orally administered disease-modifying drug (DMD), expands the available treatment options for adults with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), including clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), and active secondary progressive MS. It demonstrates bioequivalence to dimethyl fumarate and was developed to provide similar clinical benefits, but with an improved gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability profile. In RRMS patients who are treatment-naïve or were previously treated with interferon-ß or glatiramer acetate, diroximel fumarate reduces annualized relapse rates, with most patients experiencing no relapses during treatment, and reduces the formation of new MS-associated brain lesions. Diroximel fumarate has an acceptable tolerability profile that is consistent with that of dimethyl fumarate, albeit with a significantly lower rate of GI adverse events.

Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability of Monomethyl Fumarate Following a Single Oral Dose of Bafiertam™ (Monomethyl Fumarate) or Tecfidera® (Dimethyl Fumarate).

BACKGROUND: Tecfidera® (dimethyl fumarate [DMF]) is an approved product for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. Monomethyl fumarate (MMF) is the only active metabolite of DMF and is responsible for its therapeutic efficacy. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether two Bafiertam™ capsules each containing 95 mg of MMF is bioequivalent to one Tecfidera® capsule containing 240 mg of DMF, a prodrug of MMF. METHODS: This was a single-dose, open-label, randomized, two-way crossover study evaluating two treatments over two periods with a washout interval between treatments. Fifty healthy subjects were randomized to receive a single dose of the test drug MMF 190 mg as 2 × 95 mg delayed-release capsules or the reference drug DMF 240 mg as a 1 × 240-mg delayed-release capsule. Blood samples were obtained prior to dosing and at prespecified time points through 24 h post-dose to determine plasma concentrations of MMF. The pharmacokinetic parameters of MMF were calculated including maximum observed concentration, time to reach maximum observed concentration, apparent half-life of the drug in plasma, AUC0-t which is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero (dosing time) to the last time point, t, with measurable analyte concentration, and AUC0-inf, which is AUC0-t plus the extrapolated AUC from time t to infinity. RESULTS: The geometric least-squares mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of the test drug MMF vs the reference drug DMF were 96.80% (92.18-101.64), 96.35% (91.81-101.12), and 104.84% (95.54-115.05) for AUC0-t, AUC0-inf, and maximum observed concentration, respectively. Two capsules of Bafiertam™ was safe and generally well tolerated. The most common adverse event for both products was flushing, 60% and 51%, for Bafiertam™ and Tecfidera®, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the statistical analysis results of the pharmacokinetic parameters of MMF, a single oral dose of two Bafiertam™ DR 95 mg capsules is bioequivalent to a single oral dose of one Tecfidera® DR 240 mg capsule. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04570670) on 30 September, 2020.

Efficacy and safety of aliskiren combination therapy: a protocol for an umbrella review.

INTRODUCTION: Efficacy of aliskiren combination therapy with other antihypertensive has been evaluated in the treatment of patients with hypertension in recent systematic reviews. However, most previous reviews only focused on one single health outcome or one setting, none of them made a full summary that assessed the impact of aliskiren combination treatment comprehensively. As such, this umbrella review based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses is aimed to synthesise the evidences on efficacy, safety and tolerability of aliskiren-based therapy for hypertension and related comorbid patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI published from inception to August 2020 will be conducted. The selected articles are systematic reviews which evaluated efficacy, safety and tolerability of aliskiren combination therapy. Two reviewers will screen eligible articles, extract data and evaluate quality independently. Any disputes will be resolved by discussion or the arbitration of a third person. The quality of reporting evidence will be assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews V.2 tool tool. We will take a mixed-methods approach to synthesising the review literatures, reporting summary of findings tables and iteratively mapping the results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for the study, as we would only collect data from available published materials. This umbrella review will be also submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication after completion. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020192131.

Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease affects approximately seven million people globally. Iron deficiency anaemia can occur as a common systemic manifestation, with a prevalence of up to 90%, which can significantly affect quality of life, both during periods of active disease or in remission. It is important that iron deficiency anaemia is treated effectively and not be assumed to be a normal finding of inflammatory bowel disease. The various routes of iron administration, doses and preparations present varying advantages and disadvantages, and a significant proportion of people experience adverse effects with current therapies. Currently, no consensus has been reached amongst physicians as to which treatment path is most beneficial. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the interventions for the treatment of iron deficiency anaemia in people with inflammatory bowel disease. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two other databases on 21st November 2019. We also contacted experts in the field and searched references of trials for any additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials investigating the effectiveness and safety of iron administration interventions compared to other iron administration interventions or placebo in the treatment of iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease. We considered both adults and children, with studies reporting outcomes of clinical, endoscopic, histologic or surgical remission as defined by study authors. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently conducted data extraction and 'Risk of bias' assessment of included studies. We expressed dichotomous and continuous outcomes as risk ratios and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE methodology. MAIN RESULTS: We included 11 studies (1670 randomised participants) that met the inclusion criteria. The studies compared intravenous iron sucrose vs oral iron sulphate (2 studies); oral iron sulphate vs oral iron hydroxide polymaltose complex (1 study); oral iron fumarate vs intravenous iron sucrose (1 study); intravenous ferric carboxymaltose vs intravenous iron sucrose (1 study); erythropoietin injection + intravenous iron sucrose vs intravenous iron sucrose + injection placebo (1 study); oral ferric maltol vs oral placebo (1 study); oral ferric maltol vs intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (1 study); intravenous ferric carboxymaltose vs oral iron sulphate (1 study); intravenous iron isomaltoside vs oral iron sulphate (1 study); erythropoietin injection vs oral placebo (1 study). All studies compared participants with CD and UC together, as well as considering a range of disease activity states. The primary outcome of number of responders, when defined, was stated to be an increase in haemoglobin of 20 g/L in all but two studies in which an increase in 10g/L was used. In one study comparing intravenous ferric carboxymaltose and intravenous iron sucrose, moderate-certainty evidence was found that intravenous ferric carboxymaltose was probably superior to intravenous iron sucrose, although there were responders in both groups (150/244 versus 118/239, RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.46, number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 9). In one study comparing oral ferric maltol to placebo, there was low-certainty evidence of superiority of the iron (36/64 versus 0/64, RR 73.00, 95% CI 4.58 to 1164.36). There were no other direct comparisons that found any difference in the primary outcomes, although certainty was low and very low for all outcomes, due to imprecision from sparse data and risk of bias varying between moderate and high risk. The reporting of secondary outcomes was inconsistent. The most common was the occurrence of serious adverse events or those requiring withdrawal of therapy. In no comparisons was there a difference seen between any of the intervention agents being studied, although the certainty was very low for all comparisons made, due to risk of bias and significant imprecision due to the low numbers of events. Time to remission, histological and biochemical outcomes were sparsely reported in the studies. None of the other secondary outcomes were reported in any of the studies. An analysis of all intravenous iron preparations to all oral iron preparations showed that intravenous administration may lead to more responders (368/554 versus 205/373, RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.31, NNTB = 11, low-certainty due to risk of bias and inconsistency). Withdrawals due to adverse events may be greater in oral iron preparations vs intravenous (15/554 versus 31/373, RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.74, low-certainty due to risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous ferric carboxymaltose probably leads to more people having resolution of IDA (iron deficiency anaemia) than intravenous iron sucrose. Oral ferric maltol may lead to more people having resolution of IDA than placebo. We are unable to draw conclusions on which of the other treatments is most effective in IDA with IBD (inflammatory bowel disease) due to low numbers of studies in each comparison area and clinical heterogeneity within the studies. Therefore, there are no other conclusions regarding the treatments that can be made and certainty of all findings are low or very low. Overall, intravenous iron delivery probably leads to greater response in patients compared with oral iron, with a NNTB (number needed to treat) of 11. Whilst no serious adverse events were specifically elicited with any of the treatments studied, the numbers of reported events were low and the certainty of these findings very low for all comparisons, so no conclusions can be drawn. There may be more withdrawals due to such events when oral is compared with intravenous iron delivery. Other outcomes were poorly reported and once again no conclusions can be made as to the impact of IDA on any of these outcomes. Given the widespread use of many of these treatments in practice and the only guideline that exists recommending the use of intravenous iron in favour of oral iron, research to investigate this key issue is clearly needed. Considering the current ongoing trials identified in this review, these are more focussed on the impact in specific patient groups (young people) or on other symptoms (such as fatigue). Therefore, there is a need for studies to be performed to fill this evidence gap.

A case series of persistent lymphopaenia following treatment with fumaric acid esters for psoriasis.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Fumaric acid esters (FAEs) have been used for fifty years to treat moderate-to-severe psoriasis. However, recent case reports of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, associated with FAE-induced lymphopaenia, have been a cause for concern (J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2009;7:603). CASE SERIES: We report six cases of persistent lymphopaenia following cessation of treatment with FAEs, with a mean duration of lymphopaenia of 33 months. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Given the lack of evidence regarding expected recovery of lymphocyte counts, further research is required to guide physicians in the risk stratification of patients prior to considering treatment with FAEs.

Efficacy and safety of fumaric acid esters in young patients aged 10-17 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Apart from biologics, no systemic drugs are approved in Europe for children with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Retrospective observational studies have shown promising results for fumaric acid esters (FAE) in this setting. OBJECTIVES: To show superiority of FAE over placebo in terms of treatment response after 20 weeks in children and adolescents aged 10-17 years. METHODS: In a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIIb study, patients aged 10-17 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis requiring systemic therapy were randomized 2 : 1 to receive FAE (n = 91) or placebo (n = 43) over 20 weeks, followed by an open-label FAE treatment phase. The coprimary endpoints were ≥ 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) at week 20. The study was registered with EudraCT number 2012-000035-82. RESULTS: At week 20, 55% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·44-0·65] of FAE-treated patients achieved a PASI 75 response vs. 19% (95% CI 0·08-0·33) in the placebo group (absolute difference 36%, 95% CI 0·20-0·53; P < 0·001). In total, 42% (95% CI 0·32-0·53) in the FAE group vs. 7% (95% CI 0·01-0·19) in the placebo group achieved a PGA score of 0 or 1 at week 20 (absolute difference 35%, 95% CI 0·21-0·49; P < 0·001). During the double-blind period, drug-related adverse events occurred more frequently in patients receiving FAE compared with placebo (76% vs. 47%). Gastrointestinal disorders were the most common adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: FAE administered over a period of 20 weeks demonstrated a better response than placebo; the difference was statistically significant and clinically meaningful. Application up to 40 weeks was generally well tolerated. However, further studies are required.

Long-term use of fumaric acid esters for the treatment of psoriasis in daily practice.

BACKGROUND: Fumaric acid ester (FAE) is the most commonly prescribed first-line systemic therapy for the treatment of psoriasis in Germany. Although developed in the 1990s, only limited long-term data are available. METHODS: Data of 200 adult psoriatic patients from 10 study centers were collected in a noninterventional, multicenter, retrospective analysis. The inclusion criteria was treatment with FAE in 2015. RESULTS: Eighty-two percent of the patients were naive to systemic treatment. Ten percent of all patients had FAE-treatment for 10 years or longer with an average drug survival of 4.32 years. The maintenance dose was ranging from 1-4 120 mg tablets for 87.5% of the patients. In our population, 14% of the patients stopped therapy during the first six month mainly due to gastro-intestinal side effects. No serious side effects were reported. Seventy-eight percent of the patients responded to FAE therapy with improvement of their psoriasis to mild (61%) or clear (17%). The PASI 75 response was achieved in 44% of the patient during long-term treatment without remarkable differences between moderate or severe plaque psoriasis. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms FAE therapy as a long-term, first-line treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Identificação de alterações bioquímicas em células epiteliais bronquiais humanas normais expostas a fumarato / Identification of biochemical changes in normal human bronchial epitelial cells exposed to fumarate

A reprogramação metabólica de células do câncer é apontada como uma característica essencial para o desenvolvimento da doença (cancer hallmark). Estudos mostram que mutações na enzima fumarato hidratase levam ao aumento da concentração intra e extracelular de fumarato, o que ocorre paralelamente à indução da transformação maligna. Neste trabalho, a fim de entender se o excesso de fumarato extracelular pode propiciar a transformação de células normais, foram quantificados alguns endpoints relacionados aos efeitos do fumarato e à transformação maligna, além de alterações metabólicas em células imortalizadas de epitélio brônquico humano normal (BEAS-2B) expostas ao fumarato. Uma vez que fumarato nas concentrações de 0,1 a 10 mM ao longo de 144 h não foi citotóxico, foram selecionadas as concentrações de 1 mM, 5 mM e 10 mM para as incubações. Fumarato induziu a formação de colônias em soft-agar após o período de sete dias (168 h) de exposição, o que indica a indução de transformação celular. Fumarato é um oncometabólito que inibe enzimas que dependem de α-cetoglutarato como co-substrato, dentre as quais as enzimas ten eleven translocation (TET) que catalisam a formação de 5-hidroximetilcitosina (5-hmC) a partir de 5-metilcitosina (5-mC), o primeiro passo da sequência de reações que levam à desmetilação do DNA. Os níveis totais de 5-hmC estavam diminuídos no DNA das células expostas. Colônias retiradas do soft-agar (controle, 1, 5 e 10 mM de fumarato) foram cultivadas e, após 90 dias em cultura, as células foram submetidas ao ensaio de invasão e migração em câmara de Boyden (transwell), tendo sido observada maior capacidade de migração/invasão das células anteriormente expostas ao fumarato. Foi observada indução de estresse redox nas células expostas ao fumarato. A partir da quantificação de metabólitos intracelulares por HPLC-ESI-MS/MS e HPLC-ESI-Q-TOF, verificamos que as células BEAS-2B absorveram o fumarato adicionado ao meio de cultura, o qual foi convertido intracelularmente a malato, aspartato, argininosuccinato, citrato, succinato e glutamato. O oncometabólito 2-L-hidroxiglutarato foi detectado em níveis aumentados nas células expostas a fumarato, assim como adenosina, enquanto que NAD+ e NADP+ apareceram diminuídos. As alterações metabólicas na presença de fumarato contribuíram para a manutenção do balanço energético das células, ou mesmo para um saldo positivo de energia. A exposição das células a [13C4]fumarato permitiu a análise do fluxo inicial do fumarato absorvido pelas células. A partir dessa análise verificamos que o fumarato absorvido entra no ciclo de Krebs, gerando malato, que é em grande parte desviado para reações externas ao ciclo, como a geração de aspartato e argininosuccinato. Citrato proveniente das reações de [13C4]fumarato no ciclo de Krebs foi detectado em níveis inferiores aos endógenos. O uso de [13C4]fumarato permitiu a visualização da geração de [13C4]succinato, que tem como possível fonte a atividade reversa da succinato desidrogenase. Verificamos também a geração de [13C3]glutamato. Supõe-se que as alterações metabólicas induzidas pelo fumarato absorvido pelas células BEAS-2B contribuam para a modulação da expressão de genes e da atividade de proteínas que favorecem o processo tumorigênico

The metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells is identified as an essential feature for the development of the disease (a cancer hallmark). Studies show that mutations in the enzyme fumarate hydratase lead to increased intra- and extracellular fumarate concentration, which occurs in parallel with the induction of malignant transformation. In this work, in order to understand if excess extracellular fumarate can lead to the transformation of normal cells, some endpoints related to the effects of fumarate and malignant transformation were quantified, as well as metabolic alterations in the immortalized normal human bronchial epithelial cell line BEAS-2B exposed to fumarate. Since fumarate at concentrations from 0.1 to 10 mM over 144 h was not cytotoxic, the concentrations of 1 mM, 5 mM and 10 mM were selected for incubations. Fumarate induced colony formation in soft agar after the seven day (168 h) exposure period, which indicates the induction of cell transformation. Fumarate is an oncometabolite that inhibits α-ketoglutarate-dependent enzymes, among which are ten eleven translocation (TET) enzymes that catalyze the formation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) from 5-methylcytosine (5-mC), the first step in the sequence of reactions leading to DNA demethylation. Total 5-hmC levels were decreased in the DNA of exposed cells. Colonies removed from the soft-agar (control, 1, 5 and 10 mM fumarate) were cultured and after 90 days in culture the cells were subjected to the Boyden chamber (transwell) invasion and migration assay, and a greater capacity for migration/invasion of cells previously exposed to fumarate was observed. Redox stress induction was observed in cells exposed to fumarate. From the quantification of intracellular metabolites by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS and HPLC-ESI-Q-TOF, we found that BEAS-2B cells absorbed the fumarate added to the culture medium, which was intracellularly converted to malate, aspartate, argininosuccinate, citrate, succinate and glutamate. The oncometabolite 2-L-hydroxyglutarate was detected at increased levels in cells exposed to fumarate, as well as adenosine, while NAD+ and NADP+ appeared decreased. Metabolic changes in the presence of fumarate contributed to the maintenance of the energy balance of the cells, or even to a positive energy balance. Exposure of cells to [13C4]fumarate allowed the analysis of the initial flow of the fumarate absorbed by the cells. From this analysis we found that the absorbed fumarate entered the Krebs cycle, generating malate, which was largely diverted to reactions outside the cycle, such as the generation of aspartate and argininosuccinate. Citrate from the reactions of [13C4]fumarate in the Krebs cycle was detected at levels lower than endogenous. The use of [13C4]fumarate allowed the detection of [13C4]succinate, which has as its possible source the reverse activity of succinate dehydrogenase. We also observed the generation of [13C3]glutamate. The metabolic changes induced by the absorbed fumarate are supposed to contribute to the modulation of gene expression and protein activity that favor the tumorigenic process

Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Renin inhibitors (RIs) reduce blood pressure more than placebo, with the magnitude of this effect thought to be similar to that for angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. However, a drug's efficacy in lowering blood pressure cannot be considered as a definitive indicator of its effectiveness in reducing mortality and morbidity. The effectiveness and safety of RIs compared to ACE inhibitors in treating hypertension is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of renin inhibitors compared to ACE inhibitors in people with primary hypertension. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Hypertension Group Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomized controlled trials up to August 2020: the Cochrane Hypertension Specialized Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (from 1946), Embase (from 1974), the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also contacted authors of relevant papers about further published and unpublished work. The searches had no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized, active-controlled, double-blinded studies (RCTs) with at least four weeks follow-up in people with primary hypertension, which compared renin inhibitors with ACE inhibitors and reported morbidity, mortality, adverse events or blood pressure outcomes. We excluded people with proven secondary hypertension. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected the included trials, evaluated the risks of bias and entered the data for analysis. MAIN RESULTS: We include 11 RCTs involving 13,627 participants, with a mean baseline age from 51.5 to 74.2 years. Follow-up duration ranged from four weeks to 36.6 months. There was no difference between RIs and ACE inhibitors for the outcomes: all-cause mortality: risk ratio (RR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93 to 1.18; 5 RCTs, 5962 participants; low-certainty evidence; total myocardial infarction: RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.22 to 3.39; 2 RCTs, 957 participants; very low-certainty evidence; adverse events: RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.03; 10 RTCs, 6007 participants;  moderate-certainty evidence; serious adverse events: RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.64; 10 RTCs, 6007 participants; low-certainty evidence; and withdrawal due to adverse effects: RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.06; 10 RTCs, 6008 participants; low-certainty evidence. No data were available for total cardiovascular events, heart failure, stroke, end-stage renal disease or change in heart rate. Low-certainty evidence suggested that RIs reduced systolic blood pressure: mean difference (MD) -1.72, 95% CI -2.47 to -0.97; 9 RCTs, 5001 participants;  and diastolic blood pressure: MD -1.18, 95% CI -1.65 to -0.72; 9 RCTs, 5001 participants,  to a greater extent than ACE inhibitors, but we judged this to be more likely due to bias than a true effect.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of hypertension, we have low certainty that renin inhibitors (RI) and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors do not differ for all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction. We have low to moderate certainty that they do not differ for adverse events. Small reductions in blood pressure with renin inhibitors compared to ACE inhibitors are of low certainty.  More independent, large, long-term trials are needed to compare RIs with ACE inhibitors, particularly assessing morbidity and mortality outcomes, but also on blood pressure-lowering effect.

Monomethyl fumarate has better gastrointestinal tolerability profile compared with dimethyl fumarate.

BACKGROUND: Monomethyl fumarate (MMF) is the pharmacologically active metabolite of dimethyl fumarate (DMF). MMF formulated as Bafiertam™ 190 mg and DMF formulated as Tecfidera 240 mg deliver bioequivalent exposure of MMF and therefore possess the same efficacy/safety profiles. DMF is a widely used oral treatment for relapsing-remitting forms of multiple sclerosis (RRMS) but is limited in some patients, primarily female, by issues with gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, head-to-head, 5-week study evaluating the GI tolerability of MMF 190 mg vs DMF 240 mg, administered twice daily in healthy subjects, using a derivative of the self-administered Modified Overall Gastrointestinal Symptom Scale (MOGISS). Subjects were stratified (3:1, female:male) and randomized (1:1) to the treatments. The primary endpoint was the Area Under the Curve (AUC) in each of the individual symptoms in the MOGISS over the 5-week treatment period. Other endpoints included the AUC over the 5-week treatment period in the MOGISS composite and total scores; duration and severity of GI events; Number and percentage of subjects reporting GI events during the overall treatment period, and assessment of safety/tolerability. RESULTS: Inferential analysis of the hierarchical testing of overall treatment differences in each MOGISS symptom AUC occurred in a predefined sequence starting with Abdominal Pain. For each symptom, LSMean AUC values were lower for MMF than DMF, however, the first primary endpoint, Abdominal Pain, was not statistically different between treatments; thus, all subsequent statistical analyses were considered exploratory. The side effects and safety profiles observed were consistent with the known profiles of DMF, with no new or unique safety concerns noted. CONCLUSIONS: Bafiertam showed an improved gastrointestinal tolerability profile compared with Tecfidera, with less severe GI events and fewer days of self-assessed GI symptoms, fewer GI adverse events, and lower discontinuation rates because of GI adverse events.